View Single Post
  #47 (permalink)   Report Post  
Ron
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article >,
Rudy Canoza > wrote:

> Ron wrote:
>
> > In article >,
> > Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Ron wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>In article >, "Dutch" >
> >>>wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>"Ron" > wrote in message
> ...
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>In article >, "Dutch" >
> >>>>>wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>"Ron" > wrote
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Imagine that. Two different 'moral codes' existing simultaneously.
> >>>>>>>>The
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>vegan who _chooses to believe_ that it is unacceptable to kill some
> >>>>>>>animals for their food and the meat eaters who _choose to believe_ it
> >>>>>>>is
> >>>>>>>acceptable to kill some animals for their food.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>That would be fine if that were the case, but it isn't. The vegan
> >>>>>>hypocrisy
> >>>>>>is that although they *profess* to believe that it is unacceptable to
> >>>>>>kill
> >>>>>>animals for their food, their actions invalidate this claim. Vegans pay
> >>>>>>people to kill animals willy-nilly to preserve their steady supply of
> >>>>>>cheap
> >>>>>>food.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Name the vegan and the person they paid to kill what animal? I bought
> >>>>>tomatoes last week, who did I pay and what did they kill?
> >>>>
> >>>>The vegan's name was Dolores, she paid Pedro the farmer and the animal
> >>>>was
> >>>>Ferdinand the mouse. You paid Juan to kill a lizard.
> >>>>
> >>>>Just as suspected, nonsense is not very interesting, why do it?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Holding other vegans accountable for Dolores actions doesn't seem
> >>>reasonable to me.
> >>
> >>No one is attempting to hold any "vegan" responsible
> >>for the *actions* of anyone else. It is the moral
> >>outcome for which "vegans" share responsibility, not
> >>the actions.
> >>
> >>This has been explained to you dozens of times, over
> >>the course of several weeks. You either are being
> >>deliberately obtuse, or you are very stupid and unable
> >>to see the distinction. Those are the only two
> >>possible explanations.

> >
> >
> > That is really interesting. In my family and in my culture we are taught
> > that we are responsible for our actions. Your theory requires that I be
> > responsible for the outcomes of other people's actions.

>
> You share responsibility for the outcomes of other
> people's actions when those actions are done on your
> behalf,


Who taught you such nonsense?

> and when you are fully aware of the likelihood
> of the outcomes.