Scented Nectar wrote:

>>No. You can't coherently say why you should only cause
>>fewer deaths. Your belief about why they are wrong AT
>>ALL demands that you cause zero. Sorry - you just
>>don't have any choice.
>
>
> Don't be such an idiot. You're dwelling on my initial
> belief as a way of avoiding my current belief. My
> previous one is no longer an issue.

You can't coherently and rationally explain how you
moved from your stupid initial belief to your even more
stupid, and FAR weaker current belief.

>
>
>>>And it's me who gets to
>>>judge myself as to how well I'm doing.
>>
>>Nope. Anyone who can see what your standard must be,
>>and how well you meet it, is entitled to judge. You
>>come up FAR short.
>
>
> Wrong again. It's me who decides my standards.

Your standards are morally meaningless. And WE get to
judge how well you meet them. You don't come even close.

>
>
>>>Don't you get it? I can revise my goal any time I want
>>>such as recently based on new information.
>>
>>You may delude yourself into thinking that. However,
>>you CAN not revise it unless you give a coherent
>>explanation for the revision, and it is clear that you
>>cannot do so.
>
>
> I can revise it any time I like.

You are unable to give a coherent, logically and
morally consistent accounting for the revision. It is
purely ad hoc, based on your need for ease and comfort.