View Single Post
  #35 (permalink)   Report Post  
Jay Santos
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Scented Nectar wrote:

>>No. You can't coherently say why you should only cause
>>fewer deaths. Your belief about why they are wrong AT
>>ALL demands that you cause zero. Sorry - you just
>>don't have any choice.

>
>
> Don't be such an idiot. You're dwelling on my initial
> belief as a way of avoiding my current belief. My
> previous one is no longer an issue.


Your previous one is VERY MUCH an issue, because you
are unable to tell us why and how you revised it,
except as a purely ad hoc exercise in self flattery.

Your current position, by the way, is NOT that you are
"doing the best I can." You already RETREATED from
that falsehood, and in any case, I have demonstrated
conclusively and without even an attempt at refutation
from you that you are NOT "doing the best I can."

Your current position is MERELY, and emptily, that you
are doing better than omnivores at not causing as many
animal deaths. The emptiness of this claim can be seen
in the fact that omnivores don't consider the goal -
fewer animal deaths - in any way meaningful.

>
>
>>>And it's me who gets to
>>>judge myself as to how well I'm doing.

>>
>>Nope. Anyone who can see what your standard must be,
>>and how well you meet it, is entitled to judge. You
>>come up FAR short.