Scented Nectar wrote:

> "Jay Santos" > wrote in message
> ink.net...
>
>>Skanky Carpetmuncher did not know about animal
>>collateral deaths in agricultu
>>
>> At first I didn't know ***about cds***...
>>
>> Skanky Carpetmuncher - 13 Dec 2004
>>
>
> What a lesbophobic nutcase you are!

*******s are weird.

>
>
>>She did not know that cute, furry little mammals are
>>chopped to bits in the course of producing the foods
>>she eats. This didn't stop her believing that by not
>>eating meat, she was thereby causing ZERO harm to
>>animals. She believed it. By believing it, she
>>thereby proved that "vegans" begin, in their ignorance,
>>by believing in a logical fallacy. "veganism" is
>>founded on a logical fallacy.
>
>
> It doesn't matter how a vegan begins.

It most certainly DOES matter!


> I now know about cds

And aren't doing anything to stop causing them, despite
your belief that killing animals is wrong.

> and have
> concluded that there are far, far less of them in a
> vegan diet.

No good. This is where the more shocking example of
sodomizing children with broomhandles is instructive.
You cannot claim to be "more moral" than someone who
sodomizes children with a broomstick every day merely
because you only sodomize children with a broomstick
every other day.

Similarly, you cannot claim to be "doing better" than
others in terms of how many animals you cause to die
merely because you cause fewer to die than they do. If
causing animals to die is wrong, it is absolutely
wrong, and you must cause NO animals to die before you
claim to be doing "better".

> How many times must I remind you of
> this?

How many times must I demonstrate to you that you are
NOT "doing better"?