"Reynard" > wrote

>>>>animals. This belief IS the classic "vegan" Denying
>>>>the Antecedent fallacy:
>>>>
>>>> If I eat meat, I cause animals to suffer and die.
>
> This conditional proposition is false on the basis that an
> improper relationship exists between the antecedent and
> its consequent.

Do you actually think there are people reading this naive enough to be
fooled by this clumsy sleight-of-hand pedantry?