"Digger" > wrote:

> >What do you mean not vegetarian? A vegetarian doesn't eat the meat of
> >animals? If the baby doesn't eat the meat of animals, then it is
vegetarian.

> Does that logic apply to suckling lion cubs as well?

Well they don't need meat to live in the early stages so sure.

> >> I wouldn't, for the simple fact that it doesn't feed exclusively
> >> on vegetables. It's a suckling baby without any labels or
> >> stigma attached to its diet.
> >
> >What have vegetables got to do with it?
>
> Quite a bit, actually.

Elaborate.

> >You could be a vegetarian without
> >eating vegetables.
>
> No, you couldn't.

Yes you could. I wouldn't recomend it though.

> >Do you have even the slightest idea as to what a
> >vegetarian is?
>
> Some.

A person who eats no meat can be called vegetarian.

> >Of course the baby is vegetarian.
>
> No, it is not.

Denying it don't make it so.

> >It only stops being
> >vegetarian when you make it meat.
>
> It was never a vegetarian or a vegan to begin with,
> and no, I wouldn't make a baby eat meat.

Doesn't really matter what you choose to call it. A baby is vegetarian
because it eats no meat. If you think it is not, then at what point does it
become a vegetarian or a meat eater?