On 9/16/2020 7:19 AM, Mike Duffy wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:04:24 -0700, Taxed and Spent wrote:
>
>> The lack of wing tips is probably the result of a lawsuit.
>
> If someone sued about bones, would that not make the 'winglet'
> pieces more dangerous? (i.e. bigger bones, etc.)
>
> Unless advertised as 'boneless', how could a litigant expect
> a jury to believe bones should be absent in any piece of meat?
>
> Much more likely, most people don't eat the tips.
>


Well, I was sort of joking. But it could be a complaint about
advertised weight being misleading. Or anything else.