>On the other hand, no one survives without pampering to those who are paying
>......... advertisers or subscribers.
>
Robert Parker accepts no advertising or free bottles; he survives exclusively
on subscribers. But I don't see how subscribers would bias his results. So
whether you agre with Parkers palate or not, I can't see any bias here.
With the Wine Spectator, there is the possibility (unproven) that advertising
could affect their scores.
Tom Schellberg
|