View Single Post
  #15 (permalink)   Report Post  
Xyzsch
 
Posts: n/a
Default

>On the other hand, no one survives without pampering to those who are paying
>......... advertisers or subscribers.
>


Robert Parker accepts no advertising or free bottles; he survives exclusively
on subscribers. But I don't see how subscribers would bias his results. So
whether you agre with Parkers palate or not, I can't see any bias here.

With the Wine Spectator, there is the possibility (unproven) that advertising
could affect their scores.

Tom Schellberg