View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
brooklyn1 brooklyn1 is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,814
Default Luker baking chocolate (from Goya) - your opinion?

On Fri, 06 Jan 2017 12:07:59 -0700, U.S. Janet B. >
wrote:

>On Fri, 06 Jan 2017 12:36:09 -0500, Brooklyn1
> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 06 Jan 2017 07:55:35 -0700, U.S. Janet B. >
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 05 Jan 2017 20:01:14 -0500, Brooklyn1
> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 14:55:58 -0800 (PST), wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>This brand is not LABELED as being for baking - but the ingredients said only "chocolate mass." (Kind of odd.)
>>>>>
>>>>>It's cheap - $5.94 for 8.8 oz. Does anyone have any opinion as to the quality? (Amazon only has two reviews.)
>>>>>
>>>>>Here's an image:
>>>>>
>>>>>
https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon....1L._SX355_.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>>(I've always wanted to make Spanish-style chocolate for dipping French bread in; it was as thick as pudding.)
>>>>>
>>>>>Lenona.
>>>>
>>>>I have some that I bought some 20 years ago, it's good for Mexican
>>>>style hot chocolate but not for much else. I bought it at a famous
>>>>Hispanic market on Long Island, Brentwood Market, I shopped there
>>>>practically every day, but they are no longer in business, the
>>>>neighborhood changed and they closed.
>>>>
>>>>Ingredients say 100% pure cocoa. Manufactured by S.C.S. de Jose Jesus
>>>>Restrepo & Cia. S. A. Manizales Product of Colombia. Weighs 8.6 oz. I
>>>>paid $1.59... that's what the label says.
>>>>It's been sitting in my cupboard all these years in a zip-loc, about
>>>>3/4 remaining, don't remember what I used it for. It's been sitting
>>>>all these years, forgot I had it until I saw your post. If you want
>>>>it I will be happy to mail it to you, give me a snail mail addy. If
>>>>you're interested I will give you my email addy. If the email addy
>>>>you have posted is working I already sent you an email... let me know
>>>>if you want it and where to send it.
>>>
>>>In general, chocolate has a shelf life of about 2 years. You just
>>>haven't been able to tell the difference. You know that 20 years is
>>>too long to keep a food stuff, right?
>>>http://www.eatbydate.com/other/sweet...piration-date/
>>>Janet US

>>
>>Nothing at that site is true. Chocolate when properly stored can last
>>forever but with most commonly purchased commercial chocolates ten
>>years is a reasonable storage time. The white deposit that develops
>>on chocolate is called "bloom", it's the fat migrating to the surface
>>and is NOT spoilage, can be safely eaten.

>
>Too bad you didn't read it. It never said the bloom would kill you.
>It talked of lost quality.


There's no change in quality, none whatsoever... just close your eyes.
Actually chocolate bloom proves it's high quality chocolate.