On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:27:03 -0700, Dutch > wrote:

>dh@. wrote:
>> On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:06:00 -0700, Dutch > wrote:
>>
>>> dh@. wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 16:25:58 -0700, Goo lied:
>>>>
>>>>> There are
>>>>> some things he knows - for example, that existence *cannot* be a benefit
>>>>
>>>> Goober not only do I not "know" it can't be a benefit, but between your
>>>> whole little family of goobers none of you can suggest a single thing that could
>>>> possibly prevent it from being one, Goo.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ball thinks you know you're wrong. I disagree, I think you're just stupid.
>>
>> Since none of you can say what you want us to think prevents it from being a
>> benefit, I'm not the stupid one for not knowing what you want us to think
>> prevents it from being one. You're stupid for suggesting I am, and you're stupid
>> for not being able to say what you want people to think prevents it from being
>> one.
>
>You're stupid because it's been explained to you at least a hundred
>times and you still say that we can't do it.

Because you can't. I challenge you to try. Go:

>You don't even attempt to
>explain why you disagree with the explanations provided to you,

Try presenting any of the supposed explanations. Go:

>you just
>announce that nobody can say why "life is not the benefit it appears to
>be"

You can't. I challenge you to try telling us what you want people to think
prevents it from being one. Go: