On 3/18/2013 2:36 PM, ****wit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:

> On 3/14/2013 5:42 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
>> On 3/14/2013 11:42 AM, ****wit David Harrison - *Goo* - a convicted
>> felon and squat-to-**** cracker idiot, lied:
>>
>>> On 3/12/2013 4:25 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
>>>> On 3/12/2013 3:09 PM, Dutch wrote:
>>>>> ****wit David Harrison - *Goo* - a convicted felon and squat-to-****
>>>>> cracker idiot, lied:
>>>>>> On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 10:53:15 -0800, Dutch > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ****wit David Harrison - *Goo* - a convicted felon and
>>>>>>> squat-to-**** cracker idiot, lied:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 07 Mar 2013 14:45:07 -0800, Dutch > wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ****wit David Harrison - *Goo* - a convicted felon and
>>>>>>>>> squat-to-**** cracker idiot, lied:
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 19:07:57 -0800, Dutch > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> no thanks
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> More evidence that you don't eat meat at all of course, but
>>>>>>>>>> how do you want
>>>>>>>>>> to try to justify such an aversion for someone who actually
>>>>>>>>>> does...as if you
>>>>>>>>>> actually do eat meat but have the aversion?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> moron
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LOL....even MORE evidence that you don't eat meat. You can't
>>>>>>>> even think
>>>>>>>> about eating meat, even if it's never been part of a living animal.
>>>>>>>> LOL...you
>>>>>>>> sure revealed yourself this time!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I take partial responsibility for the complete idiot you have
>>>>>>> degenerated into
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL!!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> , I have allowed you to get attention from it. Sorry, I
>>>>>>> was just having a little fun, and I really thought you would
>>>>>>> eventually
>>>>>>> wise up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you finally admitting to being the veg*n eliminationist we
>>>>>> both know you
>>>>>> were and still are? I've been pointing out to you that I've been aware
>>>>>> of it the
>>>>>> entire time. You never did start eating me like you so ****poorly try
>>>>>> to pretend
>>>>>> you did. It's hard to imagine you finally being honest about even that
>>>>>> one
>>>>>> thing...LOL...and maybe even harder for you to imagine it than it is
>>>>>> for me.
>>>>>> Really though it seems like it should be a relief for you to finally
>>>>>> tell the
>>>>>> truth about it unless you get some sort of good feeling about lying,
>>>>>> which I
>>>>>> guess you must since you've been doing it for years and years...
>>>>>
>>>>> Part of me always hoped that a light bulb would eventually come on in
>>>>> your brain, but I haven't been holding my breath. All things considered
>>>>> you have to be the dumbest **** I have ever come across.
>>>>
>>>> He's worse than simply a dumb ****. He's a lying dumb ****. There are
>>>> some things he knows - for example, that existence *cannot* be a benefit
>>>> - that he lies and pretends not to know, i.e., pretends to be dumb about
>>>> it. As another example, he knows that it is not "ethically superior" to
>>>> cause livestock animals to exist rather than wanting them to be
>>>> eliminated.
>>>
>>> not only do I not "know" it can't be a benefit,
>>
>> You *do* know it, *Goo*. I have proved it to you.
>
> That's a lie

It's not a lie, *Goo*. I have proved to you beyond refutation that
existence - "getting to experience life" - is not an *CANNOT* be a
benefit. You know I've proved it, *Goo*.


> I don't prevent it, and you can't either

There is no "prevention", *Goo* - there are logic, fact and definition.

A benefit is something that improves the welfare of an entity, *Goo*.
That's the definition. Coming into existence - "getting to experience
life" - does not improve the welfare of the entity, *Goo*. That's the
fact. Because "getting to experience life" doesn't improve the entity's
welfare, *Goo*, it therefore *cannot* be a benefit. There's the logic.

You lose.