3D printed meat could soon be cheap and tasty enough to win youover
dh@. wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 15:09:18 -0700, Dutch > wrote:
>
>> dh@. wrote:
>>> On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 10:53:15 -0800, Dutch > wrote:
>>>
>>>> dh@. wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 07 Mar 2013 14:45:07 -0800, Dutch > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 19:07:57 -0800, Dutch > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> no thanks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> More evidence that you don't eat meat at all of course, but how do you want
>>>>>>> to try to justify such an aversion for someone who actually does...as if you
>>>>>>> actually do eat meat but have the aversion?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> moron
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL....even MORE evidence that you don't eat meat. You can't even think
>>>>> about eating meat, even if it's never been part of a living animal. LOL...you
>>>>> sure revealed yourself this time!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I take partial responsibility for the complete idiot you have
>>>> degenerated into
>>>
>>> LOL!!!
>>>
>>>> , I have allowed you to get attention from it. Sorry, I
>>>> was just having a little fun, and I really thought you would eventually
>>>> wise up.
>>>
>>> Are you finally admitting to being the veg*n eliminationist we both know you
>>> were and still are? I've been pointing out to you that I've been aware of it the
>>> entire time. You never did start eating me like you so ****poorly try to pretend
>>> you did. It's hard to imagine you finally being honest about even that one
>>> thing...LOL...and maybe even harder for you to imagine it than it is for me.
>>> Really though it seems like it should be a relief for you to finally tell the
>>> truth about it unless you get some sort of good feeling about lying, which I
>>> guess you must since you've been doing it for years and years...
>>
>> Part of me always hoped that a light bulb would eventually come on in
>> your brain, but I haven't been holding my breath.
>
> That pretty much says you're admitting to being an eliminationist veg*n,
> from my pov.
>
>> All things considered
>> you have to be the dumbest **** I have ever come across.
>
> Since in over a decade you haven't been able to make any attempt to say how
> you want people to think anti-consideration gives you more browny points than
> having it, you're a dumber **** than I am.
>
> Also, let's keep in mind the fact that you being opposed to eating meat that
> was never even part of an animal is MORE evidence that you never stopped being
> whatever sort of veg*n you believe you "ethically" are. You clearly revealed you
> revulsion to eating meat REGARDLESS of whether or not animals suffer to produce
> it, and of course you'd be even more opposed to it if the animals enjoy lives of
> positive value. That much we know since you're opposed to giving that aspect of
> human influence on animals any consideration at all, much less would you want to
> be a contributer to it.
>
Yep, dumbest **** ever.
|