On Thu, 07 Mar 2013 13:49:19 -0800, Goo wrote:

>On 3/7/2013 1:36 PM, ****wit David Harrison - *Goo* - a convicted felon,
>lied:
>
>> On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 21:20:14 GMT, and/or www.mantra.com/jai
>> (Dr. Jai Maharaj) wrote:
>>
>>> 3D printed meat could soon be cheap and tasty enough to win you over
>>>
>>> By Ryan Whitwam
>>> geek.com
>>> February 12, 2013
>>>
>>> The next time you’re about to bite into a hamburger, take
>>> a moment to consider the resources that went into making
>>> it. In a recent Solve for X talk, Andras Forgacs laid out
>>> all the statistics, and explained how tantalizingly close
>>> we are to a more sustainable method of meat production.
>>> Basically, humanity may soon be 3D printing meat instead
>>> of growing it in an animal.
>>
>> Something like that will be the eventual end of livestock raising, like
>> machinery was the end of the need for work horses. There will still be a few
>> around in zoos and odd farms, but there won't be billions of them experiencing
>> life because they're raised for food.
>
>Exactly. And that has no moral meaning at all - *zero*.

You think that would be better not of zero meaning Goo, but you can't say
why everyone should agree with you.

>> The same will be true for chickens etc. In
>> some cases I believe that overall will be a "good" thing like the case of cage
>> raised laying hens, and the brothers of most laying hens including cage free. In
>> others I don't believe it would necessarily be good or better from an overall
>> pov since I believe lives of positive value for livestock is a positive thing in
>> the overall.
>
>Meaningless.

It won't matter that they don't exist Goober but it does matter that they
do. ONLY eliminationists have reason to oppose considering the animals' lives,
Goo.