On 2/2/2013 8:48 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 2 Feb 2013 13:00:23 GMT, notbob > wrote:
>
>> Boy, this outta be good for a battle royal.
>>
>> Should restaurant patrons be subject to an automatic surcharge (it's
>> not a tip!) for groups over a certain number?
>>
>> I think not. I once ran across this at a Chevy's. Surcharge for
>> parties over six ppl. For what? Why? How is serving 6 ppl at one
>> table more work than serving 3 ppl at two tables? And 18%! That's
>> almost one fifth of the total added on. It's not only unfair, it's a
>> rip-off, pure and simple. If it's such a chore to serve 6 ppl at one
>> table, perhaps the proprietor should find another line of work or have
>> smaller tables with a big sign out front.
>>
>> BTW, how in God's name (it was church folk) did 20 ppl manage to run
>> up a bill of only $34 at an Applebees? Did they all order jes one
>> Coke? If I'd been the mgr, Ida told the entire lot to "fly away"
>> ....NOW!
>>
>> nb
>>
>>
>
> Surcharge? No. Tip? Yes.
>
> If the surcharge is going to the house, I'd walk out. If going to the
> wait staff, I'd just pay it and not leave a tip since that is the tip.
> While I'm of the nature that it should be my choice how much to tip,
> there are valid reasons to charge for the larger parties. The reason
> is, left to their own devices, they usually don't tip much at all. The
> larger the group, the more meager the tip.
>
Absolutely. On the flip side of having been a server, I've been out
with large groups where they offered one check and added the gratuity.
Seems okay in theory. The problem with that was some people chowed down
on appetizers and ordered the most expensive items on the lunch menu.
This should be split (monetarily) equally among the guests? Nope.

Jill