View Single Post
  #737 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,alt.agnosticism,alt.atheism,sci.skeptic
George Plimpton George Plimpton is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,258
Default Dietary ethics

On 1/28/2013 3:56 PM, ****wit David Harrison - *Goo* - convicted felon
for dog fighting, lied:

> On 1/22/2013 7:15 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
>
>> On 1/22/2013 3:37 PM, ****wit David Harrison - *Goo* - convicted felon
>> for dog fighting, lied:
>>
>>> On 1/21/2013 7:25 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 1/21/2013 3:05 PM, ****wit David Harrison - *Goo* - convicted felon
>>>> for dog fighting, lied:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:40:27 -0800, George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:20:45 -0500, ****wit David Harrison - *Goo* -
>>>>>> convicted felon for dog fighting, lied:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 13:38:50 -0800, George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:34:23 -0500, ****wit David Harrison - *Goo*
>>>>>>>> - convicted felon for dog fighting, lied:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 13:44:48 -0800, George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:38:03 -0500, ****wit David Harrison -
>>>>>>>>>> *Goo* - convicted felon for dog fighting, lied:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 15:47:39 -0800, George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 13:29:54 -0500, ****wit David Harrison -
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Goo* - convicted felon for dog fighting, lied:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:15:49 -0800, George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:16:39 -0500, ****wit David Harrison -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Goo* - convicted felon for dog fighting, lied:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:23:26 -0800, George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:06:20 -0500, ****wit David Harrison
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - *Goo* - convicted felon for dog fighting, lied:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 15:36:27 -0800, George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 17:48:46 -0500, ****wit David
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Harrison - *Goo* - convicted felon for dog fighting, lied:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 17:29:10 -0800, George Plimpton
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, and I forgot James Hepler.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [bullshit]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> James Hepler told you your "animals getting to experience
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> life" nonsense
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was bullshit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He asked if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> James Hepler told you point blank that your "getting to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experience life"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bullshit was pure bullshit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL!!!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL!!!!!!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> James Hepler did, of course, tell you your "animals getting to
>>>>>>>>>>>> experience life" story is bullshit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm saying to David Harrison that his "at least they get
>>>>>>>>>>>> to live"
>>>>>>>>>>>> argument only applies to HIM and humans, that animals
>>>>>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>>>>>> derive the benefit of getting to live
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> How do you think
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> James Hepler told you point-blank your "at least they get to live"
>>>>>>>>>> gibberish is bullshit.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They do live
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No moral meaning to that, *Goo*, and James Hepler told you
>>>>>>>> so...as did
>>>>>>>> Martin Martens, John Mercer, Felix, Swamp, diderot, Illinois
>>>>>>>> Bowhunter,
>>>>>>>> and Sue Bishop.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not to YOU
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It has no meaning, period - zero.
>>>>>
>>>>> people who honestly believe decent AW
>>>>
>>>> The animals "getting to experience life" has no moral meaning to anyone,
>>>> *Goo*. That's just a fact - an indisputable fact.
>>>
>>> Of course it does

>>
>> No, it has no moral meaning *at all*, *Goo*. Everyone knows it -
>> including you. You're just being pig-shit stubborn and stupid again.

>
> It certainly has as much or more than their deaths


No, it does not. It has *NO* meaning at all, *Goo* - zero. Their
deaths *do* have some meaning, because ending a life is morally
troubling. Changing the course of action so that some animal lives
don't happen is meaningless, *to the animals*. It *cannot* have any
meaning to the animals that are not going to exist, ****wit.