On 1/10/2013 12:21 PM, ****wit David Harrison - *Goo* - kept his
fourteen year string of futility alive with:

> On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:23:29 -0800, George Plimpton easily defeated *Goo* again:
>
>> On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:06:02 -0500, ****wit David Harrison - *Goo* - kept his fourteen year string of futility alive with:
>>
>>> On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 15:36:27 -0800, George Plimpton easily defeated *Goo* again:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 17:48:37 -0500, ****wit David Harrison - *Goo* - kept his fourteen year string of futility alive with:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 17:29:09 -0800, George Plimpton easily defeated *Goo* again:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 14:28:25 -0500, ****wit David Harrison - *Goo* - kept his fourteen year string of futility alive with:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:01:16 -0800, George Plimpton easily defeated *Goo* again:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ****wit David Harrison - *Goo* - kept his fourteen year string of futility alive and presented *no* challenge with:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 11:35:25 -0800, George Plimpton easily defeated *Goo* again:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:04:29 -0500, ****wit David Harrison - *Goo* - kept his fourteen year string of futility alive with:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 20:09:30 -0800, Dutch > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Lord Infomouse wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/24/2012 2:30 PM, ****wit David Harrison - *Goo* - kept his fourteen year string of futility alive with:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Part of the problem that I see is that you have made Goober and Rupert
>>>>>>>>>>>>> both your enemies
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Everybody who bothers to figure out what a load of bullshit he's pushing
>>>>>>>>>>>> is his enemy.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert is bullshitting by
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What Woopert has said, correctly, is that you can't give any coherent
>>>>>>>>>> meaning to "lives of possitive [sic] value" except to bullshit
>>>>>>>>>> tautologically. That is completely true: all you can offer as
>>>>>>>>>> explanation is that a life of possitive [sic] value is one that doesn't
>>>>>>>>>> have too much negative value in it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Negative value caused by what
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The cruel treatment you advocate and personally inflict, *Goo*.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Explain exactly what cruel treatment
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Entering fighting cocks and fighting dogs into animal combats, *Goo*.
>>>>>
>>>>> That doesn't happen to
>>>>
>>>> You've done it.
>>>
>>> You have no clue about the value of life for
>>
>> The value of life for the animals you have entered into animal combats
>> is entirely negative.
>
> You proved me

....to be a cruelty-inflicting dumb cracker liar, *Goo*.