DOZENS OF WORLD CLASS ATHLETIC VEGANS SUPPORT ME IN EMAIL
On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:23:29 -0800, Goo proved me correct:
>On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:06:02 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 15:36:27 -0800, Goo wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 17:48:37 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 17:29:09 -0800, Goo wussed:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 14:28:25 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:01:16 -0800, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>dh challenged Goo:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 11:35:25 -0800, Goo defeated Goo easily again:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:04:29 -0500, dh challenged Goo:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 20:09:30 -0800, Dutch > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Lord Infomouse wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/24/2012 2:30 PM, dh challenged Goo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> They do
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Part of the problem that I see is that you have made Goober and Rupert
>>>>>>>>>>>> both your enemies
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Everybody who bothers to figure out what a load of bullshit he's pushing
>>>>>>>>>>> is his enemy.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Rupert is bullshitting by
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What Woopert has said, correctly, is that you can't give any coherent
>>>>>>>>> meaning to "lives of possitive [sic] value" except to bullshit
>>>>>>>>> tautologically. That is completely true: all you can offer as
>>>>>>>>> explanation is that a life of possitive [sic] value is one that doesn't
>>>>>>>>> have too much negative value in it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Negative value caused by what, Goo?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>The cruel treatment you advocate and personally inflict
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Explain exactly what cruel treatment you want people to think cause
>>>>>>suffering to livestock animals or it will be known that once again you have no
>>>>>>idea what you think you're trying to talk about, Goo.
>>>>>
>>>>>Entering fighting cocks and fighting dogs into animal combats
>>>>
>>>> That doesn't happen to any animals raised for food Goober. You've made it
>>>>known that you have no idea what you think you're trying to talk about in
>>>>regards to any animals raised for food Goob.
>>>
>>>You've done it.
>>
>> You have no clue about the value of life for any animals raised for food
>>Goo, and much MUCH less in regards to animals who fight for their lives. LOL!
>>It's hilarious thinking about you trying to think about it Goob, not that you
>>could even if you tried of course. That's what's funny about it.
>
>The value of life for the animals you have entered into animal combats
>is entirely negative.
LOL!!! You proved me correct, Goo.
>>You can't even
>>appreciate that there could be significant difference between raising chickens
>>to fight and raising dogs to fight. You brother can't either Goo. He can't even
>>think about it in regards to the few grass raised animals he tried pretending
>>he could do it for:
>>
>>"I accept that some nonhuman animals who are raised for food on farms
>>have lives which are such that it is better that they live that life
>>than that they not live at all" - Rupert
>>
>>>>Your brother Rupert doesn't either,
>>>>nor does your boy "Dutch". LOL...you people sure do SUCK AT THIS, Goo.
|