|
Posted to soc.culture.indian,alt.fan.jai-maharaj,alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.animals.rights.promotion
|
|
|
The First Thanksgiving - by Rynn Berry
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:49:23 -0800, Goo lost again:
>On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:58:41 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 12:34:08 -0800, Goo wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 14:34:15 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:45:36 -0800, Goo timidly puled:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 17:29:07 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:45:01 -0800 (PST), "Mr.Smartypants"
> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Nov 29, 3:16*pm, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>>> dh pointed out:
>>>>>>>> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 10:18:56 -0800, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 13:02:30 -0500, dh pointed out:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>> On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 14:38:01 -0800, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>> On 11/22/2012 12:57 PM, Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:
>>>>>>>> >>>>> The First Vegetarian Thanksgiving
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>> [ Subject: The First Vegetarian Thanksgiving
>>>>>>>> >>>>> [ From:
>>>>>>>> >>>>> [ Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>> The First Vegetarian Thanksgiving
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>> By Rynn Berry
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>http://all-creatures.org/articles/tgveg-rb.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>> [Ed.] "But it's tradition," is the cry when vegetarians
>>>>>>>> >>>>> wonder why killing an animal should make Thanksgiving
>>>>>>>> >>>>> special. Vegetarian historian Rynn Berry begs to differ.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>> The story of the Pilgrim's First Thanksgiving -- and
>>>>>>>> >>>>> turkey's place in it -- has been shown to be largely a
>>>>>>>> >>>>> myth.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>> No, it hasn't.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>> Whether or no, millions of turkeys today experience life
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Meaningless. *Their "getting to experience life" has no moral meaning,
>>>>>>>> and therefore it deserves and gets no consideration from rational people.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You must have considered it in order to decide it doesn't get
>>>>>>>consideration which defines you as irrational, Gooby.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's another classic Goobal self-outstupidification by Goo having no idea
>>>>>>how he wants people to think he thinks he disagrees with himself:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"I give the lives of animals that exist *LOTS*
>>>>>>of consideration. I also give the not-yet-begun lives
>>>>>>of animals that are "in the pipeline", so to speak, a
>>>>>>lot of consideration" - Goo
>>>>>
>>>>>It's another instance of me pointing out the obvious
>>>>
>>>> It's another classic example of you disagreeing with yourself Goober, and we
>>>>know from plenty of past experience that you have no idea how you want people to
>>>>think you do disagree with yourself. I challenge you to try explaining how you
>>>>want us to think you disagree with yourself Goob. Go:
>>>>. . . .
>>>>
>>>>You lose, Goo.
>>>
>>>It's anoth
>>
>> Try to explain HOW you want people to think you disagree with yourself about
>>this Goo. Go:
>
>"Ge
You lose again, Goo.
|