On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:57:23 +0000, Derek > wrote:

>On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 02:34:00 -0800 (PST), Rupert >
>wrote:
>
>[]
>>> >So what you're saying is that you think that Ball probably
>>> >deliberately ****ed on his floor and then posted to usenet about it?
>>>
>>> * * If he did the ****ing he was probably so wasted when he did it the first few
>>> times that he didn't realise what he was doing, and later figured it out but
>>> kept doing it since it had already been done several times.... Then he got in
>>> the habit of it for a while until one day the smell got so bad that he decided
>>> to finally quit doing it, and then later found out how much trouble he set
>>> himself up for trying to get it to quit stinking. It makes more sense than that
>>> cats had done it years ago or whatever and Goo just noticed it one day after
>>> having lived there for however long. We know Goo lies about his own quotes as or
>>> more often than not...at least I'm aware of it even if you honestly aren't. We
>>> know Goo lied about it not taking a while for him to respond, Goo lied about
>>> having been asked about the issue in the past, and Goo lied about me having told
>>> you I knew Slater forged what he presented. Why would Goo lie about those things
>>> if he's not lying about the cats? Why???
>>
>>First of all
>
>How can you waste a single moment responding to that nonsense and not feel
>debased in some small way, Rupert? What the ****'s the matter with you?

LOL!!!!!!!!!! Now THAT is very strong evidence the Goober is lying about the
cats. If he wasn't there would be nothing for you to save him from, but
obviously you feel that there is something to save him from.