On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 10:19:22 -0800 (PST), Rupert >
wrote:

>On Nov 14, 6:57*pm, Derek > wrote:
>> On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 02:34:00 -0800 (PST), Rupert >
>> wrote:
>>
>> []
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >> >So what you're saying is that you think that Ball probably
>> >> >deliberately ****ed on his floor and then posted to usenet about it?
>>
>> >> * * If he did the ****ing he was probably so wasted when he did it the first few
>> >> times that he didn't realise what he was doing, and later figured it out but
>> >> kept doing it since it had already been done several times.... Then he got in
>> >> the habit of it for a while until one day the smell got so bad that he decided
>> >> to finally quit doing it, and then later found out how much trouble he set
>> >> himself up for trying to get it to quit stinking. It makes more sense than that
>> >> cats had done it years ago or whatever and Goo just noticed it one day after
>> >> having lived there for however long. We know Goo lies about his own quotes as or
>> >> more often than not...at least I'm aware of it even if you honestly aren't. We
>> >> know Goo lied about it not taking a while for him to respond, Goo lied about
>> >> having been asked about the issue in the past, and Goo lied about me having told
>> >> you I knew Slater forged what he presented. Why would Goo lie about those things
>> >> if he's not lying about the cats? Why???
>>
>> >First of all
>>
>> How can you waste a single moment responding to that nonsense and not feel
>> debased in some small way, Rupert? What the ****'s the matter with you?
>
>Good question, really. I agree with you.

Well, if it's any consolation to you, I've found myself involved in a lot
worse.