On Nov 6, 6:02*pm, dh@. wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 04:27:42 -0800 (PST), Rupert >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Nov 5, 9:57 pm, dh@. wrote:
> >> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 09:16:38 -0700 (PDT), Rupert >
> >> wrote:
> >> >On Nov 1, 4:49 pm, dh@. wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 01:15:14 -0700 (PDT), Rupert >
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >On 29 Okt., 23:03, dh@. wrote:
> >> >> >> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 01:38:52 -0700 (PDT), Rupert >
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >On Oct 24, 9:36 pm, dh@. wrote:
> >> >> >> >> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:32:51 -0700 (PDT), Rupert >
> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> >On Oct 24, 12:36 am, dh@. wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> So far it appears clear that he is. Though Goo tried to wuss it off as
> >> >> >> >> >> Slater forging something, it seems Slater copied Goo's original post which Goo
> >> >> >> >> >> later removed, and Slater presented again much to the Goober's sorrow. It seems
> >> >> >> >> >> unlikely that Goo it telling the truth about Slater forging anything considering
> >> >> >> >> >> the fact that Goo has lied about several other little things regarding the
> >> >> >> >> >> topic. Why would Goo lie about little things if the big thing were not itself a
> >> >> >> >> >> lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?
>
> >> >> >> >> >It's completely obvious that the post by Slater is a forgery..
>
> >> >> >> >> If so then why does Goo lie about little things if the big thing is not
> >> >> >> >> itself a lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?
>
> >> >> >> >What has he lied about?
>
> >> >> >> For one thing Goo lied that I told you I knew Slater forged it, when of
> >> >> >> course I still don't know that and in fact it's looking more and more like he
> >> >> >> didn't as time goes along. If you're going to try to help the Goober lie about
> >> >> >> this (imo of course because of your admiration for him) then you need to present
> >> >> >> the evidence for it that Goo has been completely unable to attempt presenting.
> >> >> >> What Goo's trying to do is wuss away from it for however long he waits, and then
> >> >> >> he'll begin lying that it's already been presented and hilariously suggest that
> >> >> >> we go back and try to find it for him. Why do you want to support Goo's lie
> >> >> >> about this particular thing anyway, do you know?
>
> >> >> >I don`t wish to support anything Ball has said. I simply asked you a
> >> >> >question.
>
> >> >> You questioned him about it before, which of course was/is a surprise to me.
> >> >> Maybe he scolded you for it through email?
>
> >> >Of course not;
>
> >> Of course that's what you would say if he did, and we know it.
>
> >Why do you suppose that would be?
>
> * * Because you wouldn't want me to think you're both on the same team as I do,
> and that you sometimes discuss things through email.
>

If Ball took it into his head to email me for whatever reason, that
would not mean that "we sometimes discuss things through email",
unless I chose to reply to him, and it would not mean that I have any
motivation to conceal the fact from you.

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >> >don't be stupid.
>
> >> LOL...it would be stupid if I didn't take that possibility into
> >> consideration since from my pov it seems as or more likely than not.
>
> >> >> He also lied that he hasn't been
> >> >> asked about his ****ing in the past.
>
> >> >Did he; where did he say that?
>
> >> He lied about it and Ron pointed out that he was lying. Do you want to think
> >> he's too honest to lie about that or what?
>
> >> >> He also lied that it didn't take him a
> >> >> while to come up with his story about Slater. So it seems likely enough he's
> >> >> lying about the cats too since he's lying about everything else.
>
> >> >May this belief of yours bring you joy.
>
> >> Goo's the one creating the impression that he lied about the cats by lying
> >> about other things. I'm just going by the Goober's lies, and now also the things
> >> you apparently don't want to believe your hero (Goo) is lying about.
>
> >And you find the issue interesting?
>
> * * I was curious about what I remembered to begin with, and now I'm curious
> about why Goo lied about some of the things he lied about. Why make up
> unecessary lies about things that don't really matter if he's not lying about
> the main issue?

So what you're saying is that you think that Ball probably
deliberately ****ed on his floor and then posted to usenet about it?