On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 04:27:42 -0800 (PST), Rupert >
wrote:

>On Nov 5, 9:57*pm, dh@. wrote:
>> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 09:16:38 -0700 (PDT), Rupert >
>> wrote:
>> >On Nov 1, 4:49 pm, dh@. wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 01:15:14 -0700 (PDT), Rupert >
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >On 29 Okt., 23:03, dh@. wrote:
>> >> >> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 01:38:52 -0700 (PDT), Rupert >
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >On Oct 24, 9:36 pm, dh@. wrote:
>> >> >> >> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:32:51 -0700 (PDT), Rupert >
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >On Oct 24, 12:36 am, dh@. wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> So far it appears clear that he is. Though Goo tried to wuss it off as
>> >> >> >> >> Slater forging something, it seems Slater copied Goo's original post which Goo
>> >> >> >> >> later removed, and Slater presented again much to the Goober's sorrow. It seems
>> >> >> >> >> unlikely that Goo it telling the truth about Slater forging anything considering
>> >> >> >> >> the fact that Goo has lied about several other little things regarding the
>> >> >> >> >> topic. Why would Goo lie about little things if the big thing were not itself a
>> >> >> >> >> lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?
>>
>> >> >> >> >It's completely obvious that the post by Slater is a forgery.
>>
>> >> >> >> If so then why does Goo lie about little things if the big thing is not
>> >> >> >> itself a lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?
>>
>> >> >> >What has he lied about?
>>
>> >> >> For one thing Goo lied that I told you I knew Slater forged it, when of
>> >> >> course I still don't know that and in fact it's looking more and more like he
>> >> >> didn't as time goes along. If you're going to try to help the Goober lie about
>> >> >> this (imo of course because of your admiration for him) then you need to present
>> >> >> the evidence for it that Goo has been completely unable to attempt presenting.
>> >> >> What Goo's trying to do is wuss away from it for however long he waits, and then
>> >> >> he'll begin lying that it's already been presented and hilariously suggest that
>> >> >> we go back and try to find it for him. Why do you want to support Goo's lie
>> >> >> about this particular thing anyway, do you know?
>>
>> >> >I don`t wish to support anything Ball has said. I simply asked you a
>> >> >question.
>>
>> >> You questioned him about it before, which of course was/is a surprise to me.
>> >> Maybe he scolded you for it through email?
>>
>> >Of course not;
>>
>> * * Of course that's what you would say if he did, and we know it.
>>
>
>Why do you suppose that would be?

Because you wouldn't want me to think you're both on the same team as I do,
and that you sometimes discuss things through email.

>> >don't be stupid.
>>
>> * * LOL...it would be stupid if I didn't take that possibility into
>> consideration since from my pov it seems as or more likely than not.
>>
>> >> He also lied that he hasn't been
>> >> asked about his ****ing in the past.
>>
>> >Did he; where did he say that?
>>
>> * * He lied about it and Ron pointed out that he was lying. Do you want to think
>> he's too honest to lie about that or what?
>>
>> >> He also lied that it didn't take him a
>> >> while to come up with his story about Slater. So it seems likely enough he's
>> >> lying about the cats too since he's lying about everything else.
>>
>> >May this belief of yours bring you joy.
>>
>> * * Goo's the one creating the impression that he lied about the cats by lying
>> about other things. I'm just going by the Goober's lies, and now also the things
>> you apparently don't want to believe your hero (Goo) is lying about.
>
>And you find the issue interesting?

I was curious about what I remembered to begin with, and now I'm curious
about why Goo lied about some of the things he lied about. Why make up
unecessary lies about things that don't really matter if he's not lying about
the main issue?