On Nov 1, 4:49*pm, dh@. wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 01:15:14 -0700 (PDT), Rupert >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 29 Okt., 23:03, dh@. wrote:
> >> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 01:38:52 -0700 (PDT), Rupert >
> >> wrote:
> >> >On Oct 24, 9:36 pm, dh@. wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:32:51 -0700 (PDT), Rupert >
> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >On Oct 24, 12:36 am, dh@. wrote:
> >> >> >> So far it appears clear that he is. Though Goo tried to wuss it off as
> >> >> >> Slater forging something, it seems Slater copied Goo's original post which Goo
> >> >> >> later removed, and Slater presented again much to the Goober's sorrow. It seems
> >> >> >> unlikely that Goo it telling the truth about Slater forging anything considering
> >> >> >> the fact that Goo has lied about several other little things regarding the
> >> >> >> topic. Why would Goo lie about little things if the big thing were not itself a
> >> >> >> lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?
>
> >> >> >It's completely obvious that the post by Slater is a forgery.
>
> >> >> If so then why does Goo lie about little things if the big thing is not
> >> >> itself a lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?
>
> >> >What has he lied about?
>
> >> For one thing Goo lied that I told you I knew Slater forged it, when of
> >> course I still don't know that and in fact it's looking more and more like he
> >> didn't as time goes along. If you're going to try to help the Goober lie about
> >> this (imo of course because of your admiration for him) then you need to present
> >> the evidence for it that Goo has been completely unable to attempt presenting.
> >> What Goo's trying to do is wuss away from it for however long he waits, and then
> >> he'll begin lying that it's already been presented and hilariously suggest that
> >> we go back and try to find it for him. Why do you want to support Goo's lie
> >> about this particular thing anyway, do you know?
>
> >I don`t wish to support anything Ball has said. I simply asked you a
> >question.
>
> * * You questioned him about it before, which of course was/is a surprise to me.
> Maybe he scolded you for it through email?

Of course not; don't be stupid.

> He also lied that he hasn't been
> asked about his ****ing in the past.

Did he; where did he say that?

> He also lied that it didn't take him a
> while to come up with his story about Slater. So it seems likely enough he's
> lying about the cats too since he's lying about everything else.

May this belief of yours bring you joy.