On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 01:15:14 -0700 (PDT), Rupert >
wrote:

>On 29 Okt., 23:03, dh@. wrote:
>> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 01:38:52 -0700 (PDT), Rupert >
>> wrote:
>> >On Oct 24, 9:36 pm, dh@. wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:32:51 -0700 (PDT), Rupert >
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >On Oct 24, 12:36 am, dh@. wrote:
>> >> >> So far it appears clear that he is. Though Goo tried to wuss it off as
>> >> >> Slater forging something, it seems Slater copied Goo's original post which Goo
>> >> >> later removed, and Slater presented again much to the Goober's sorrow. It seems
>> >> >> unlikely that Goo it telling the truth about Slater forging anything considering
>> >> >> the fact that Goo has lied about several other little things regarding the
>> >> >> topic. Why would Goo lie about little things if the big thing were not itself a
>> >> >> lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?
>>
>> >> >It's completely obvious that the post by Slater is a forgery.
>>
>> >> If so then why does Goo lie about little things if the big thing is not
>> >> itself a lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?
>>
>> >What has he lied about?
>>
>> * * For one thing Goo lied that I told you I knew Slater forged it, when of
>> course I still don't know that and in fact it's looking more and more like he
>> didn't as time goes along. If you're going to try to help the Goober lie about
>> this (imo of course because of your admiration for him) then you need to present
>> the evidence for it that Goo has been completely unable to attempt presenting.
>> What Goo's trying to do is wuss away from it for however long he waits, and then
>> he'll begin lying that it's already been presented and hilariously suggest that
>> we go back and try to find it for him. Why do you want to support Goo's lie
>> about this particular thing anyway, do you know?
>
>I don`t wish to support anything Ball has said. I simply asked you a
>question.

You questioned him about it before, which of course was/is a surprise to me.
Maybe he scolded you for it through email? He also lied that he hasn't been
asked about his ****ing in the past. He also lied that it didn't take him a
while to come up with his story about Slater. So it seems likely enough he's
lying about the cats too since he's lying about everything else.