View Single Post
  #14 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
Mr.Smartypants[_4_] Mr.Smartypants[_4_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 107
Default Is it true Goo is the ****er?

On Oct 29, 9:53*am, Rupert > wrote:
> On Oct 27, 9:20*pm, "Mr.Smartypants" >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 27, 5:23*am, Rupert > wrote:

>
> > > On Oct 26, 9:15*pm, "Mr.Smartypants" >
> > > wrote:

>
> > > > On Oct 26, 2:59*am, Rupert > wrote:

>
> > > > > On Oct 25, 8:05*pm, "Mr.Smartypants" >
> > > > > wrote:

>
> > > > > > On Oct 25, 2:38*am, Rupert > wrote:

>
> > > > > > > On Oct 25, 8:27*am, "Mr.Smartypants" >
> > > > > > > wrote:

>
> > > > > > > > On Oct 24, 2:05*pm, George Plimpton > wrote:

>
> > > > > > > > > On 10/24/2012 12:36 PM, dh@. wrote:

>
> > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:32:51 -0700 (PDT), Rupert >
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:

>
> > > > > > > > > >> On Oct 24, 12:36 am, dh@. wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >>> * * *So far it appears clear that he is. Though Goo tried to wuss it off as
> > > > > > > > > >>> Slater forging something, it seems Slater copied Goo's original post which Goo
> > > > > > > > > >>> later removed, and Slater presented again much to the Goober's sorrow. It seems
> > > > > > > > > >>> unlikely that Goo it telling the truth about Slater forging anything considering
> > > > > > > > > >>> the fact that Goo has lied about several other little things regarding the
> > > > > > > > > >>> topic. Why would Goo lie about little things if the big thing were not itself a
> > > > > > > > > >>> lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?

>
> > > > > > > > > >> It's completely obvious that the post by Slater is a forgery.

>
> > > > > > > > > > * * *If so then why does he lie about little things

>
> > > > > > > > > I don't.

>
> > > > > > > > > You knew all along that Slater forged the post.

>
> > > > > > > > apparently he didn't know that. What happened to the original post,
> > > > > > > > Wussypussy?

>
> > > > > > > Ball provided a link to the original post in a previous thread.

>
> > > > > > there's no proof it's the original. Goo used to delete many of his
> > > > > > posts when these groups were on Deja News.

>
> > > > > Well, it is a post made by Ball, and Slater's post is a modified
> > > > > version of it.

>
> > > > Yeh, and Goo's post might be the 2nd of it's kind.

>
> > > Does that strike you as a plausible hypothesis?

>
> > Given that Goo has a history of revising posts to suit his agenda and
> > a history of deleting posts that he's ashamed of, I'm open to any
> > scenario including the one I theorized.

>
> Do you think it has a probability greater than 0.01?



Are you a bookie now?;o)