On Oct 25, 8:05*pm, "Mr.Smartypants" >
wrote:
> On Oct 25, 2:38*am, Rupert > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 25, 8:27*am, "Mr.Smartypants" >
> > wrote:
>
> > > On Oct 24, 2:05*pm, George Plimpton > wrote:
>
> > > > On 10/24/2012 12:36 PM, dh@. wrote:
>
> > > > > On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:32:51 -0700 (PDT), Rupert >
> > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > >> On Oct 24, 12:36 am, dh@. wrote:
> > > > >>> * * *So far it appears clear that he is. Though Goo tried to wuss it off as
> > > > >>> Slater forging something, it seems Slater copied Goo's original post which Goo
> > > > >>> later removed, and Slater presented again much to the Goober's sorrow. It seems
> > > > >>> unlikely that Goo it telling the truth about Slater forging anything considering
> > > > >>> the fact that Goo has lied about several other little things regarding the
> > > > >>> topic. Why would Goo lie about little things if the big thing were not itself a
> > > > >>> lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?
>
> > > > >> It's completely obvious that the post by Slater is a forgery.
>
> > > > > * * *If so then why does he lie about little things
>
> > > > I don't.
>
> > > > You knew all along that Slater forged the post.
>
> > > apparently he didn't know that. What happened to the original post,
> > > Wussypussy?
>
> > Ball provided a link to the original post in a previous thread.
>
> there's no proof it's the original. Goo used to delete many of his
> posts when these groups were on Deja News.

Well, it is a post made by Ball, and Slater's post is a modified
version of it.