On 10/24/2012 12:36 PM, dh@. wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 02:32:51 -0700 (PDT), Rupert >
> wrote:
>
>> On Oct 24, 12:36 am, dh@. wrote:
>>> So far it appears clear that he is. Though Goo tried to wuss it off as
>>> Slater forging something, it seems Slater copied Goo's original post which Goo
>>> later removed, and Slater presented again much to the Goober's sorrow. It seems
>>> unlikely that Goo it telling the truth about Slater forging anything considering
>>> the fact that Goo has lied about several other little things regarding the
>>> topic. Why would Goo lie about little things if the big thing were not itself a
>>> lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?
>>
>> It's completely obvious that the post by Slater is a forgery.
>
> If so then why does he lie about little things

I don't.

You knew all along that Slater forged the post.