On Oct 24, 12:36*am, dh@. wrote:
> * * So far it appears clear that he is. Though Goo tried to wuss it off as
> Slater forging something, it seems Slater copied Goo's original post which Goo
> later removed, and Slater presented again much to the Goober's sorrow. It seems
> unlikely that Goo it telling the truth about Slater forging anything considering
> the fact that Goo has lied about several other little things regarding the
> topic. Why would Goo lie about little things if the big thing were not itself a
> lie he thinks the little lies somehow support?

It's completely obvious that the post by Slater is a forgery.