On Oct 9, 5:43*pm, George Plimpton > wrote:
> On 10/9/2012 8:12 AM, Rupert wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 9, 5:03 pm, George Plimpton > wrote:
> >> On 10/9/2012 3:34 AM, Rupert wrote:
>
> >>> On Oct 8, 7:07 pm, George Plimpton > wrote:
> >>>> On 10/8/2012 9:37 AM, spamtrap1888 wrote:
>
> >>>>> On Oct 8, 9:01 am, Rupert > wrote:
> >>>>>> On Oct 8, 5:45 pm, spamtrap1888 > wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> On Oct 8, 4:50 am, Rupert > wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> On Sep 21, 8:00 am, George Plimpton > wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>> On 9/20/2012 3:04 PM, Just.Some.guy wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Check this out Its great
> >>>>>>>>>>http://youtu.be/1LIyVBWaE_A
>
> >>>>>>>>> It's shit. *It's unpalatable shit.
>
> >>>>>>>> How would you be in a position to know?
>
> >>>>>>>>> Why are "vegans" continually trying to make stuff look like and taste
> >>>>>>>>> like meat? **Extremely* suspicious.
>
> >>>>>>>> Why?
>
> >>>>>>> Why do you think they call vegan meat Satan?
>
> >>>>>> I didn't realize they did call it that.
>
> >>>>> They changed the spelling to throw people off the track.:
>
> >>>>>http://www.vrg.org/recipes/vjseitan.htm
>
> >>>> Ha ha ha ha ha - good one!
>
> >>> You thought it was a good joke?
>
> >> It was a great joke, especially because you fell for it.
>
> > I don't really understand why you think I fell for it.
>
> Because I saw you fall for it. *You fell right over.

I don't understand what you mean. What happened was that I said I
didn't realize that they called vegan meat Satan, which is of course
true. At that stage I didn't realize that he wanted to make a pun on
the names of one of the mock meats, but then he explained himself.

Is that in some way "falling for" the joke? How would my response have
been different if I hadn't fallen for it?