****wit David Harrison, convicted felon in Buford, GA, lied:

> On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 02:06:58 -0700 (PDT), Rupert >
> wrote:
>
>> On 31 Jul., 20:42, Dutch > wrote:
>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>> So what's your explanation for why he claims he doesn't think it?
>>>
>>> When it's laid out for him in simple terms he realizes how idiotic it
>>> sounds so he can't say he believes it.
>>>
>>> But then he proceeds to attack vegans, "eliminationists", for their
>>> failure to provide the opportunity for animals to experience "decent AW".
>>>
>>> He's not bright enough to realize that by doing so he is admitting that
>>> he implicitly believes that non-existent animals can "lose" something.
>>
>> It's one thing to claim he's being inconsistent; that's different from
>> claiming that he's lying about what he thinks.
>
> It's obvious that George is lying, and

No, it's obvious that *you're* the one lying, Goo:

The animals that will be raised for us to eat
are more than just "nothing", because they
*will* be born unless something stops their
lives from happening. Since that is the case,
if something stops their lives from happening,
whatever it is that stops it is truly "denying"
them of the life they otherwise would have had.
****wit - 12/09/1999

You claimed you *couldn't* believe the unconceived animals would
experience a loss, ****wit, because you considered them to be "nothing".
But it's a lie, ****wit - you do *NOT* consider them to be "nothing."