On Aug 2, 4:50*pm, George Plimpton > wrote:
> On 8/2/2012 7:43 AM, Rupert wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 2, 4:39 pm, George Plimpton > wrote:
> >> On 8/2/2012 6:59 AM, Rupert wrote:
>
> >>> On Aug 2, 3:39 pm, George Plimpton > wrote:
> >>>>>>>> No. *The things he says that are lies don't contradict his statements of
> >>>>>>>> belief.
>
> >>>>>>> Well, I must have misunderstood you
>
> >>>>>> They don't contradict his statements of belief because the apparent
> >>>>>> contradictions are lies. *His statements of belief are "true" in the
> >>>>>> sense that they accurately state his beliefs. *When he says that the
> >>>>>> "unborn animals" will experience some loss if their conception and birth
> >>>>>> are prevented, he is expressing a belief that is in accord with all of
> >>>>>> his other unsolicited statements of belief. *When he says he couldn't
> >>>>>> believe "they" would experience a loss because he considers them to be
> >>>>>> "nothing", that is a lie, and so it cannot contradict his statement of
> >>>>>> belief.
>
> >>>>> You appear to be confused about what "contradict" means.
>
> >>>> No.
>
> >>> I'm afraid
>
> >> Because you've not been taking your anti-psychotic meds.
>
> You should get back on them, or else very unpleasant wobbliness will result.
>

I am taking them as prescribed.

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >>>>>> * * Only if he truly believed that the unconceived farm animals are
> >>>>>> "nothing" could it be contradictory, but he doesn't believe that, as I
> >>>>>> have proved.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> ****wit *still* believes that the "getting to experience life" is
> >>>>>>>>>>>> important - *morally* important - to the animals themselves, even before
> >>>>>>>>>>>> they are conceived and born and exist as rational people think of
> >>>>>>>>>>>> existence. *The *only* way he can believe that is if he believes they
> >>>>>>>>>>>> "pre-exist in some sense." *He does believe that. *He is an idiot.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Well, you certainly seem to be convinced.
>
> >>>>>>>>>> I'm right.
>
> >>>>>>>>> So you would appear to believe.
>
> >>>>>>>> You know I'm right. *You just like being an asshole.
>
> >>>>>>> You seem to react in a very hostile way when someone isn't persuaded
> >>>>>>> by your argument.
>
> >>>>>> You just like being an asshole - a bloated-ego asshole.
>
> >>>>> You seem to be rather intolerant of differences of opinion.
>
> >>>> No.
>
> >>> That's very funny.
>
> >> No.
>
> > Well, I laughed.
>
> Psychosis.
>

That was quite funny as well.

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I don't hate you
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ha ha ha ha ha ha! *Yes, you do, Woopert. *It's irrational, but that's
> >>>>>>>>>>>> consistent for you.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Why do you think I hate you?
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Irrationality.
>
> >>>>>>>>> No,
>
> >>>>>>>> Yes.
>
> >>>>> What led you to the conclusion that I hate you
>
> >>>> What you write here, and your obsession with me.
>
> >>> Where do you see the evidence of hatred?
>
> >> In your posts.
>
> > Can you be more specific?
>
> <yawn>

Your belief that I hate you is irrational.