Dietary ethics
dh@. wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 13:30:08 -0700, Dutch lied:
>
>> dh@. wrote:
>>
>>> I showed that you only want to consider bad things because and only because
>>> considering positive aspects for millions of livestock animals works against the
>>> elimination objective, Goo.
>>
>> Aside from battery hens, *you* only want to consider the good. You're
>> just as nonobjective as ARAs, in fact you're worse.
>
> There's no way that's true, so you're lying blatantly again. Not only are
> you lying blatantly, but you also have no idea which other lives I might believe
> are most often of negative value, if any.
So list them.
|