On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:18:18 -0700 (PDT), misanthropic_curmudgeon
> wrote:
>On Jun 26, 1:53*pm, "jmcquown" > wrote:
>> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
>>
>> om...
>>
>> > On 25/06/2012 8:01 PM, notbob wrote:
>> >> On 2012-06-25, Tara > wrote:
>>
>> >>> "McDonald's in Canada answers the question "Why does your food look
>> >>> different in the advertising than what is in the store?" with this
>>
>> >> In the US, it's perfectly legal to "enhance" reality and shoot pics
>> >> that are not even remotely close to what's being sold over the
>> >> counter. *I can't find the link, but it's been discussed, here,
>> >> before.
>>
>> > I was disappointed to hear learn how little little pure fruit juice has to
>> > be in a product for it to be called pure fruit juice. Call me old
>> > fashioned or just plan naive, but I had been under the impression that
>> > pure fruit juice would be just that.... pure fruit juice.
>>
>> We could always go back to the days of 'I Love Lucy' and squeeze our own
>> orange or grapefruit juice every morning
>
>Why would you want to squeeze the juice out of fruit for breakfast?
>All the (albeit natural) sugar without any of the fibre or half the
>nutrition, and making a mess along with it.
>
>Seems like madness to me.
>
>Just eat the thing!
Hey, we don't need any stinkin' fibre... when we want shit we'll
squeeze your head. LOL