On Tue, 1 May 2012 10:26:36 -0700, "Dutch" > wrote:

><dh@.> wrote
>> On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:22:07 -0700, "Dutch" > wrote:
>
>>>>>I don't oppose considering what happens when AW is successful, I oppose
>>>>>"considering what they get out of it" because it doesn't accomplish
>>>>>anything.
>>>>
>>>> It suggests that providing lives of positive value can be considered
>>>> ethically equivalent or superior to elimination, which is why you're
>>>> opposed to
>>>> it.
>>>
>>>It does nothing.
>>
>> That's a blatant lie since it does what I pointed out, and we both know
>> it.
>
>It doesn't do what you think it does

It suggests that providing lives of positive value can be considered
ethically equivalent or superior to elimination, which is why you're
opposed to it.