View Single Post
  #134 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals,alt.food.vegan,alt.food.vegan.science
George Plimpton George Plimpton is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,258
Default "Decent lives of possitive [sic] value"

****wit David Harrison, convicted breeder of fighting birds, lied:
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:22:51 -0700, George Plimpton authoritatively wrote:
>
>> It just means "existence"

>
> Not to me, but


Yes, it only means existence to you, Goo. You don't give any
consideration to the quality of life for farm animals at all, Goo -
you've told us repeatedly that you don't:

It's not out of consideration for porcupines
that we don't raise them for food. It's because
they would be a pain in the ass to raise. We
don't raise cattle out of consideration for them
either, but because they're fairly easy to
raise.
Goo/****wit David Harrison - Sep 26, 2005

I am not an extremist about it, and if I thought
that all of the animals I eat had terrible
lives, I would still eat meat. That is not
because I don't care about them at all, but I
would just ignore their suffering.
Goo/****wit David Harrison - Nov 29, 1999

I would eat animals even if I thought that it was
cruel to them, and even if they gained nothing from
the deal. Is that what you want me to say? It is true.
But that doesn't mean that I can't still like the animals
also....
Goo/****wit David Harrison - Sept 23, 1999

I don't try to eat ethically, because I don't really care enough
to make the effort.
Goo/****wit David Harrison - July 31, 2003


*ALL* you care about is if they exist, Goo. Stop lying about your
"consideration", Goo - it's fake.