<dh@.> wrote
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 12:26:54 -0700, "Dutch" > wrote:

>>Your "consideration" doesn't benefit any livestock.
>
> It does by resulting in options like cage free and free range eggs

That's a lie, consideration of animal suffering, followed by demanding and
buying cage free eggs is what results in options like cage free and free
range eggs.

Your "LoL" (an apt acronym) consideration is just you patting yourself on
the back after the fact. It does NOTHING for animals and that is proven by
the fact that you can't name a single animal that has ever benefitted from
it.

> while
> your anticonsideraion can benefit NOTHING other than the elimination
> objective.

The so-called "elimination objective" is irrelevant. We both oppose it,
whether you accept that or not. Your decade-long attempt to classify even
the most staunch antis as ARAs for opposing the horseshit that is The LoL,
is beyond laughable.