View Single Post
  #92 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals,alt.food.vegan,alt.food.vegan.science
Derek[_3_] Derek[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 31
Default "vegan" arrogance and egotism

On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:10:49 -0700, George Plimpton >
wrote:

>On 3/25/2012 4:55 PM, Derek wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 15:28:00 -0700, George >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/25/2012 10:58 AM, Derek wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 18:36:44 +0100, > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 25/03/2012 18:17, Derek wrote:
>>>> []
>>>>>> So who ARE you, Glen, and why did you copy and paste parts of my
>>>>>> private email to you here?
>>>>>
>>>>> My sincere apologies Derek. I didn't mean any damage by it.
>>>>
>>>> No harm no foul, I usually say, but there was a measure of intent in
>>>> there, I assume.
>>>>
>>>>> Guess we got off to a bad start, eh?
>>>>
>>>> I believe that "start" happened a few years ago, "Glen", so who are
>>>> you?
>>>
>>> My best guess was that it was "Zakhar", better known as "greggeorge",
>>> but not sure now. It's obviously a Brit. Whoever it is was here
>>> earlier and is too gutless to say what he was using for a name back
>>> then. Anyway, he's an asshole.

>>
>> I'm leaning more and more towards blackmailing Ray Slater. He
>> threatened to print your address here a few times, and stalking people
>> via facebook wouldn't surprise me in the least.

>
>Doesn't write enough like Slater. Slater got weepy almost immediately.
>
>I think it's this douche:
>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a...8?dmode=source
>
>I worked with that ****wit at Apple Computer back in the 1980s. He was a
>nice enough guy at the time, but he later came here and admitted he was
>just trying to get to bang "vegan" chicks. He's a dishonorable ****,
>too, because I "sold" him a nice futon with a hardwood frame, and he
>never paid up. I thought he was good for it, but he stiffed me, the ****.


Heh heh heh. He called you a "feeble excuse for a monkey's arse."
I like him already.

Anyway, I sussed it a while ago but didn't want to say until I'd got
all my ducks in a row, so to speak. The veiled sarcasm in his use of
the term St. Derek wasn't veiled enough: I saw straight through it.

Anyway - those 11 ducks.

1) I sometimes used to use a nym on other Usenet groups with the email
.

2) My middle name is Mark.

3) I had a friend called Glen who died mysteriously in his sleep aged
about 13.

4) I use a period after St., omit the period after 'D' in Ph.D, and I
spell honour with a 'u', just like Glen and Mark.

5) And there's this (below).

[start]
oh yes you did jonathan ball

.................................................. ...............................
.................................................. ...

> What do you have?


Ph.D. economics, UCLA. You?

http://groups.google.com/group/misc....7726abf?dmode=...


.................................................. ...............................
.................................................. .....

> So you're a drop-out


Nope. Ph.D. in economics; UCLA.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.c...ab479c7d4f0?hl...
ource


.................................................. ...............................
.................................................. ...

> You lied, as usual.


no. you lied.
[end]
a ghost of Usenet past Apr 6 2011 http://tinyurl.com/cb56ycr

6) This person, a ghost of Usenet past, used the email and
quotes the same way Glen does with lines of dots or dashes under each
quote.

7) He uses and abuses periods the same way I do, and he includes the
'u' in honour, being British.

8) Mark, a ghost of Usenet past and Glen are the same person and have
writing characteristics similar to mine.

9) There's only one person similar to me with a motive to embarrass
me, and probably you, but with only half the ability to pull it off,
and that's my twin.

10) I'm fairly certain he still 'monitors' this group and follows me
around usenet, generally.

[start - David]
> >> >It sure is.... hehehhe

[me- using a variation of the Reti opening to see if it was David]
> >> P-QB3

[David's common response to a variation of the Reti opening (a school
of thought in chess that demands control of the center from a safe
distance instead of occupying the very center squares) is]
> >P-KB4 hahahahaha

[me, satisfied that it is David (he never tries to control anything
from a distance, opting instead always to occupy it from the very
center squares). Reckless, but he usually succeeds with it anyway.]
> Okay, what do you want?

[David]
**** all. Just monitoring.
[end]
Father Onearly (David, my twin)
Dec 11 2008
http://tinyurl.com/ycscfcq

11) He knows the arguments raised here nearly as well as I do and
could probably hold his own as a vegan if he wanted to. I know he's
been tempted to try.

12) More, nothing would satisfy him better than wrong-footing me and
beating me at my own game, especially on my own board: a.a.e.v. More
still, he wouldn't be able to resist leaving me a few clues to show
how clever he'd been after I'd lost the game.

Note to David.

A half-decent opening. A lively but reckless middle. Poor end-game.
Checkmate!