On 3/22/2012 9:29 AM, Rupert wrote:
> On 22 Mrz., 16:38, George > wrote:
>> On 3/22/2012 2:28 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 22, 5:12 am, George > wrote:
>>>> On 3/21/2012 8:40 PM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>> On Mar 21, 9:53 pm, George > wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/21/2012 12:22 PM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 8:14 pm, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 3/21/2012 12:02 PM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 8:00 pm, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 3/21/2012 11:40 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 7:36 pm, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/21/2012 10:59 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 6:13 pm, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/21/2012 9:27 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21 Mrz., 17:19, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/21/2012 9:12 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21 Mrz., 15:55, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/21/2012 12:08 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 7:58 am, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/20/2012 11:53 PM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 7:36 pm, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/20/2012 10:03 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 5:38 pm, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/20/2012 8:44 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 4:13 pm, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/19/2012 10:31 PM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 7:27 pm, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/19/2012 9:39 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 4:29 pm, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 11:37 PM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 7:15 am, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 11:07 PM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 6:13 am, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 8:09 PM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 6:16 pm, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 1:07 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 2:33 am, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 3:33 PM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 8:00 pm, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 8:33 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exaltation and sanctimony.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is inherently ugly, and
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There isn't any such authentic desire. It's really all about the ego
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and self-image of the so-called "vegan".
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This belief of yours strikes me as irrational.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it doesn't. You just say that to try to deflect attention from you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> own ego gratification and self-exaltation.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How exactly do you think I am trying to exalt myself
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Believing that you're "better" than omnivores based on what you don't eat.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You do.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you think that?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ask pointless questions?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I asked the question because I was curious to know the answer.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Really?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Really!?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes. Do you perhaps have some alternative explanation in mind?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't seem very willing to share your thoughts with me at the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You didn't ask me to share them - you just asked me if I had any.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, I would be interested to hear what the alternative explanation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is that you have in mind, if you care to share it.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll give some consideration (!) to sharing it.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, I hope you will share it, because the chances are it will be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amusingly stupid.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it almost certainly would not be.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Presumably you know what alternative explanation you have in mind of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> why I asked the question.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When you say that it "almost certainly would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not be" amusingly stupid, does that mean that there is some doubt in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your mind about the matter?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No.- Zitierten Text ausblenden -
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Zitierten Text anzeigen -
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then why do you say "almost certainly" as opposed to "certainly"?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you teaching beginning algebra in Germany?- Zitierten Text ausblenden -
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Zitierten Text anzeigen -
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, I'm not doing any teaching, why?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then how are you ****ing away your time in Germany?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doing research on topological twin buildings and topological groups.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So, the telemarketing job was a bust, eh?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know why you keep carrying on about that telemarketing job.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> I thought it suited you.
>>
>>>>>>>>> You think a lot of things.
>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, and nearly all of them are high-quality thoughts. Among them are
>>>>>>>> what an arrogant and egotistical goof you are.
>>
>>>>>>> A lot of people who know me better than you do don't think I'm
>>>>>>> arrogant and egotistical.
>>
>>>>>> I'm sure a lot of people think ****wit makes perfect sense, too.
>>
>>>>> I find that rather unlikely.
>>
>>>> You don't know the circle of people with whom ****wit associates.
>>>> ****wit has said that his associates find his bizarre, poorly founded
>>>> blabbering about philosophy and ethics to be very sensible. We know
>>>> already that ****wit's associates are as wretchedly uneducated as he is
>>>> - guys who have maintenance jobs in rural taverns or occasional work as
>>>> band roadies as ****wit has said he has don't tend to associate with
>>>> thinking people.
>>
>>>> I /do/ know the class of people with whom you associate, because
>>>> although I didn't complete my Ph.D., I was around those people for a
>>>> long time, and some people I know who did finish the program are still
>>>> friends and acquaintances.
>>
>>> Another point you're missing, George, is that quite a lot of my family
>>> and friends haven't done any kind of postgraduate study, and yet they
>>> still don't think that I'm arrogant and egotistical.
>>
>> They're suck-ups.
>
> You're a fool.

You're an arrogant and egotistical clueless urbanite. **** off.