On 3/21/2012 12:02 PM, Rupert wrote:
> On Mar 21, 8:00 pm, George > wrote:
>> On 3/21/2012 11:40 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 21, 7:36 pm, George > wrote:
>>>> On 3/21/2012 10:59 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>> On Mar 21, 6:13 pm, George > wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/21/2012 9:27 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> On 21 Mrz., 17:19, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 3/21/2012 9:12 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>> On 21 Mrz., 15:55, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 3/21/2012 12:08 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 7:58 am, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/20/2012 11:53 PM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 7:36 pm, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/20/2012 10:03 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 5:38 pm, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/20/2012 8:44 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 4:13 pm, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/19/2012 10:31 PM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 7:27 pm, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/19/2012 9:39 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 4:29 pm, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 11:37 PM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 7:15 am, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 11:07 PM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 6:13 am, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 8:09 PM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 6:16 pm, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/2012 1:07 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 18, 2:33 am, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 3:33 PM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 8:00 pm, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 8:33 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 3:50 pm, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/17/2012 1:05 AM, Rupert wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 6:12 am, George > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's just a hideously ugly fake word on its face, and the loathsome
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ideas and false beliefs encapsulated in it are even more hideously ugly.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's ugly about the ideas involved in veganism?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> False morality is inherently ugly, especially when it involves self
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exaltation and sanctimony.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't believe that a desire to do something about animal suffering
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is inherently ugly, and
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There isn't any such authentic desire. It's really all about the ego
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and self-image of the so-called "vegan".
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This belief of yours strikes me as irrational.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it doesn't. You just say that to try to deflect attention from you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> own ego gratification and self-exaltation.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How exactly do you think I am trying to exalt myself
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Believing that you're "better" than omnivores based on what you don't eat.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You do.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you think that?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ask pointless questions?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I asked the question because I was curious to know the answer.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Really?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Really!?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes. Do you perhaps have some alternative explanation in mind?
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't seem very willing to share your thoughts with me at the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You didn't ask me to share them - you just asked me if I had any.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, I would be interested to hear what the alternative explanation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is that you have in mind, if you care to share it.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll give some consideration (!) to sharing it.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, I hope you will share it, because the chances are it will be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> amusingly stupid.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it almost certainly would not be.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Presumably you know what alternative explanation you have in mind of
>>>>>>>>>>> why I asked the question.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes.
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> When you say that it "almost certainly would
>>>>>>>>>>> not be" amusingly stupid, does that mean that there is some doubt in
>>>>>>>>>>> your mind about the matter?
>>
>>>>>>>>>> No.- Zitierten Text ausblenden -
>>
>>>>>>>>>> - Zitierten Text anzeigen -
>>
>>>>>>>>> Then why do you say "almost certainly" as opposed to "certainly"?
>>
>>>>>>>> Are you teaching beginning algebra in Germany?- Zitierten Text ausblenden -
>>
>>>>>>>> - Zitierten Text anzeigen -
>>
>>>>>>> No, I'm not doing any teaching, why?
>>
>>>>>> Then how are you ****ing away your time in Germany?
>>
>>>>> Doing research on topological twin buildings and topological groups.
>>
>>>> So, the telemarketing job was a bust, eh?
>>
>>> I don't know why you keep carrying on about that telemarketing job.
>>
>> I thought it suited you.
>
> You think a lot of things.

Yes, and nearly all of them are high-quality thoughts. Among them are
what an arrogant and egotistical goof you are.