The 'vegan' shuffle
On Mar 8, 5:10*pm, George Plimpton > wrote:
> On 3/8/2012 8:09 AM, Rupert wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 8, 4:50 pm, George > *wrote:
> >> On 3/8/2012 12:18 AM, Rupert wrote:
>
> >>> On Mar 7, 8:21 pm, George > * *wrote:
> >>>> On 3/7/2012 11:10 AM, Glen wrote:
>
> >>>>> On 07/03/2012 17:17, George Plimpton wrote:
> >>>>>> On 3/7/2012 8:56 AM, Rupert wrote:
> >>>>> flushed
> >>>>>>> If you don't think that your contribution to global warming violates
> >>>>>>> human rights, then how do you figure Glen is violating the polar
> >>>>>>> bears' rights?
>
> >>>>>> When did I suggest he was violating the polar bears' *rights*?
>
> >>>>> You implied it asshole.
>
> >>>> I didn't, you cocksucker.
>
> >>> If you didn't want to imply that,
>
> >> I didn't, and nothing I wrote suggested I did.
>
> > Yes, the context of what you wrote suggested that
>
> No, I didn't suggest that at all.
You yourself didn't suggest it, but the context of the exchange does
indeed strongly suggest just that.
|