On Mar 8, 4:50*pm, George Plimpton > wrote:
> On 3/8/2012 12:18 AM, Rupert wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 7, 8:21 pm, George > *wrote:
> >> On 3/7/2012 11:10 AM, Glen wrote:
>
> >>> On 07/03/2012 17:17, George Plimpton wrote:
> >>>> On 3/7/2012 8:56 AM, Rupert wrote:
> >>> flushed
> >>>>> If you don't think that your contribution to global warming violates
> >>>>> human rights, then how do you figure Glen is violating the polar
> >>>>> bears' rights?
>
> >>>> When did I suggest he was violating the polar bears' *rights*?
>
> >>> You implied it asshole.
>
> >> I didn't, you cocksucker.
>
> > If you didn't want to imply that,
>
> I didn't, and nothing I wrote suggested I did.

Yes, the context of what you wrote suggested that you did indeed want
to imply that. You obviously wanted to criticise Glen for failing to
live up to his own views about animal rights. There would be no good
reason to mention the connection between his activities and harm to
polar bears unless you believed that this supported your case in some
way.