Attn: Woopert - "glen" claims to be "cruelty free" (was The'vegan' shuffle)
On 7 Mrz., 18:10, George Plimpton > wrote:
> On 3/7/2012 8:46 AM, Rupert wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 7 Mrz., 17:45, George > *wrote:
> >> On 3/7/2012 8:26 AM, Rupert wrote:
>
> >>> On 7 Mrz., 17:14, George > * *wrote:
> >>>> On 3/6/2012 11:14 PM, Rupert wrote:
>
> >>>>> On Mar 6, 4:56 pm, George > * * *wrote:
> >>>>>> On 3/6/2012 12:57 AM, Rupert wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> On Mar 6, 5:08 am, George > * * * *wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Woopert, "glen" here is a "vegan" who claims his diet doesn't kill *any*
> >>>>>>>> animals. *What do you have to say to him, Woopert?
>
> >>>>>>> He is incorrect.
>
> >>>>>> That's all??? *That's the best you can manage?
>
> >>>>> Seems like an eminently reasonable and sensible statement to me, and
> >>>>> all that needs to be said.
>
> >>>> It seems pretty weak and begrudging to me.
>
> >>> Well, you're a bit weird.
>
> >> Nope.
>
> >> You didn't expend a minute fraction as much effort trying to tell "glen"
> >> that he's wrong as I did on ****wit Harrison.
>
> > Why should I?
>
> Intellectual integrity, maybe?
There was absolutely no breach of intellectual integrity. You asked me
to make a comment about what Glen was saying and I did, correctly
reporting what my view was. My intellectual integrity was
unimpeachable.
|