What to eat
On Mar 3, 10:05*am, "Dutch" > wrote:
> "Rupert" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 2, 10:34 pm, "Dutch" > wrote:
> >> "Rupert" > wrote
>
> >> > I wouldn't want to rule out the possibility that there might be some
> >> > dietary choices she might make which are not vegetarian and yet are
> >> > nevertheless just as good as a vegetarian diet
>
> >> Or better, with respect to health AND negative impact on animals.
>
> >> > but you haven't given
> >> > her practical guidance about any specific such choice.
>
> >> Buy local, buy organic. A free range organic chicken from a local farmer
> >> arguably supplies more nutrition per calorie at a lower environmental
> >> cost
> >> than an equivalent amount of imported and/or processed plant-based
> >> product,
> >> vegetables or fruit.
>
> > You think a local free range organic chicken involves less harm than
> > plant foods?
>
> Which plant foods?
>
Well, I ate potato gnocchi with tofu and lentils and carrots the other
night, are you suggesting that I would have been better off with a
local free-range organic chicken, from the point of view of animal
suffering?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >> > In the absence
> >> > of specific practical advice going vegetarian is a good strategy for
> >> > her to reduce her contribution to animal suffering.
>
> >> Its one strategy, however it carries the risk of nutritional deficiencies
> >> in
> >> some people, and it tends to lead to the dreaded "holier than thou"
> >> syndrome. If those pitfalls can be avoided then it has advantages.
>
> >> > It's also better
> >> > for her health to be vegetarian than not.
>
> >> Clearly categorically false.
>
> > Wrong. Two doctors have told me that being a vegetarian is an
> > excellent choice for my health.
>
> That's not what you said.
The distinction is lost on me, I'm sorry.
|