<dh@.> wrote in message ...
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:34:00 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>><dh@.> wrote in message ...
>>> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:12:27 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>>
>>>><dh@.> wrote in message
m...
>>>>> On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 15:06:26 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>><dh@.> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:57lhg7lo7lfsi5begucfj3ro1i0pq9v2op@4ax. com...
>>>>>>> On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 16:10:15 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Every product derived from the animal shares in the resultant death
>>>>>>>>toll.
>>>>>>>>Why would pet food and leather be exempt?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Because it was only raised for food.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Then no leather or pet food were produced.
>>>>>
>>>>> It was raised for food, and leather and pet food are made from the
>>>>> waste. It
>>>>> would still be raised for food regardless of what the waste is used
>>>>> for.
>>>>
>>>>It's not waste, any more than the meat is waste.
>>>
>>> LOL! You certainly have some amusing ideas. You think sometimes
>>> Tbones
>>> and
>>> Ribeyes are waste products of the leather industry...LOL...
>>
>>I said neither is waste.
>
> You lied, which is not the least bit unusual for you. Hadn't you
> noticed?

You're an idiot, man has not thrown away animal hides since the species
evolved.