"Ozgirl" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> "W. Baker" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Julie Bove > wrote:
>>
>> : "Tiger Lily" > wrote in message
>> : ...
>> : > On 1/1/2012 4:36 PM, Malcom "Mal" Reynolds wrote:
>> : >> In >, "Julie
>> : >> >
>> : >> wrote:
>> : >>
>> : >>> "Robert > wrote in message
>> : >>> ...
>> : >>>> There's a post on gastroparesis over in misc.health.diabetes that
>> I
>> : >>>> thought you would want to see.
>> : >>>
>> : >>> Why? I know I have it. A post telling me that less diabetics have
>> it
>> : >>> than
>> : >>> originally thought just doesn't do me any good.
>> : >>
>> : >> once again julie goes to great lengths to demonstrate just how
>> ungrateful
>> : >> she is
>> : >> for any help
>> : >
>> : > without even reading the post in question that had nothing to do with
>> her
>> : > "i already know it all" approach
>> : >
>> : > i give up
>> : >
>> : > i've tried
>> : >
>> : > and i'm probably be STUPID enough to reply to her again (i know i
>> have
>> : > already today)
>> : >
>> : > but the animosity that her every post exhibits..................
>> Julie,
>> : > send me a FOAD e-mail, you have my info
>>
>> : I guess I don't even know what you are talking about.
>>
>> : I saw a post by Wendy. She failed to put the link on ASD but she put a
>> link
>> : up on MHD. The link said that fewer people have gastroparesis than
>> : originally thought. I know I have it. It has been confirmed twice by
>> a
>> : gastroenterologist.
>>
>> : I also saw Ozgirl reply about a person she knew that not only had that
>> but
>> : bowel cancer. And that woman was on a liquid diet.
>>
>> : What does this have to do with me? I just don't get it.
>>
>> : Apparently I am missing something.
>>
>> : You are clearly angry with me but I don't know why.
>>
>> I had sent the post about the article to BOTH MHD AND ASD, BUT FOR SOME
>> REASON, NOT MY FAULT it never arrived on asd. It was not my failure!!!!
>>
>> The implication that somehow iwas wrong or not good enough to not have
>> put
>> it on asd is not vice. Why say I dfailed, rather than something like it
>> was just on mhd or no evaluation comment at all?
>>
>> Wendy
>
> Wendy, the word *failed* doesn't have to have negative connotations. If I
> send an email and get a message back that the message has failed that
> doesn't mean I wasn't good enough or wrong etc, just that the sending
> didn't succeed in its purpose. In this instance I don't think Julie meant
> you any ill will by using the (correct) word.

I didn't and I honestly don't know why everyone is getting so upset.