dh@. wrote in :

>> You would not say the same about child sex abuser thinking
>> of creating a baby for his own purposes, would you?
>
> Since livestock aren't generally sexually abused by their
> farmers there's no reason to try comparing those
> completely different situations as if they weren't
> completely different.

You don't think it's okay to eat babies just as long if you were not eating
them the babies would not be born in the first place, do you? Why should
it be different for animals in the rich first world where we have more
healthy alternatives?

--
Praise be to Jahbulon, holy god of Royal Arch Freemasons
http://www.freemasonrywatch.org/jahbulon.html

"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you,
then they fight you, then you win"