<dh@.> wrote in message ...
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 11:28:31 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 11:00:15 -0800, dh@. wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 8 Dec 2011 16:36:47 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>><dh@.> wrote in message
m...
>>>>> On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 13:57:58 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 11:56:36 -0800, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 18:23:23 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>><dh@.> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>news:bvagd7drjll6ds6nvounhd5a31ltl21mua@4a x.com...
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:33:17 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:27:28 -0800, dh@. pointed out:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> All I did was to point out a fact. Apparently it's another
>>>>>>>>>>> one of
>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>facts that you people hate. So it's not me that disgusts you, but
>>>>>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>>>>fact is
>>>>>>>>>>>what disgusts you. Why does it "disgust" you that what I've been
>>>>>>>>>>>pointing
>>>>>>>>>>>out
>>>>>>>>>>>for ten years, has been true for ten thousand years?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>A meaningless one.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For one thing it's not meaningless and for another even if it
>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>> be no reason for you to hate it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Vegans don't promote life for livestock animals, you
>>>>>>>>>>don't promote life for porcupines, who cares?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> People who want to promote decent AW over elimination.
>>>>>>>>> Doiiieee.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>That is an invalid dichotomy. Doiiieee.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Decent AW" <retch> is promoted over "poor AW"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's also promoted over eliminations.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>By you
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL!!! By anyone who favors decent AW over elimination.
>>>. . .
>>>>invalid dichotomy
>>>
>>> Explain how you want people to try to pretend it is. Go:
>>
>>Non-parallel
>>
>>"Decent AW"...relates a scenario where
>>livestock animals are...bred
> . . .
>>"elimination" ... relates to a scenario where no animals are bred
>
> Then the choice between the two lifestyles isn't a dichotomy at all,
> not a
> false one

You offer it as a dichotomy ("A over B"), it's false for the reasons I
stated. The whole premise is fake, a very sloppy attempt at sleight of
hand..