On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 11:28:31 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:

>On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 11:00:15 -0800, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 8 Dec 2011 16:36:47 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>><dh@.> wrote in message ...
>>>> On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 13:57:58 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 11:56:36 -0800, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 18:23:23 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>><dh@.> wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:bvagd7drjll6ds6nvounhd5a31ltl21mua@4ax .com...
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:33:17 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:27:28 -0800, dh@. pointed out:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> All I did was to point out a fact. Apparently it's another one of
>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>facts that you people hate. So it's not me that disgusts you, but the
>>>>>>>>>>fact is
>>>>>>>>>>what disgusts you. Why does it "disgust" you that what I've been
>>>>>>>>>>pointing
>>>>>>>>>>out
>>>>>>>>>>for ten years, has been true for ten thousand years?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>A meaningless one.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For one thing it's not meaningless and for another even if it was
>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>> be no reason for you to hate it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Vegans don't promote life for livestock animals, you
>>>>>>>>>don't promote life for porcupines, who cares?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> People who want to promote decent AW over elimination. Doiiieee.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>That is an invalid dichotomy. Doiiieee.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Decent AW" <retch> is promoted over "poor AW"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's also promoted over eliminations.
>>>>>
>>>>>By you
>>>>
>>>> LOL!!! By anyone who favors decent AW over elimination.
>>. . .
>>>invalid dichotomy
>>
>> Explain how you want people to try to pretend it is. Go:
>
>Non-parallel
>
>"Decent AW"...relates a scenario where
>livestock animals are...bred
.. . .
>"elimination" ... relates to a scenario where no animals are bred

Then the choice between the two lifestyles isn't a dichotomy at all, not a
false one. BTW it's also not a kangaroo or a tv dinner, both of which are
equally significant to it not being a dichotomy or an invalid dichotomy either,
which is no significance at all.