<dh@.> wrote in message ...
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:33:17 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:27:28 -0800, dh@. pointed out:
>>
>>> All I did was to point out a fact. Apparently it's another one of
>>> those
>>>facts that you people hate. So it's not me that disgusts you, but the
>>>fact is
>>>what disgusts you. Why does it "disgust" you that what I've been pointing
>>>out
>>>for ten years, has been true for ten thousand years?
>>
>>A meaningless one.
>
> For one thing it's not meaningless and for another even if it was that
> would
> be no reason for you to hate it.
>
>>Vegans don't promote life for livestock animals, you
>>don't promote life for porcupines, who cares?
>
> People who want to promote decent AW over elimination. Doiiieee.

That is an invalid dichotomy. Doiiieee.

"Decent AW" <retch> is promoted over "poor AW"

"Elimination" is promoted over "continuation" (of livestock farming).

Continuation is necessary before AW of any kind can be a consideration.

I realize this simple explanation goes over your head, which leads me to,
again, you are the singularly stupidest, most dishonest asshole I have ever
had the misfortune to encounter. Normally those two character traits would
be mutually exclusive, but not in your case.