On Sat, 05 Jun 2004 10:58:08 -0700, Dan Clore
> wrote:

>zztop8970 wrote:
>> "G*rd*n" > wrote in message
>> ...
:
>>>
>>>>>>Why would any company want their employees following organized crime
>>>>>>thugs?
>
>>>"G*rd*n" >:
>>>
>>>>>One modest regular payment to the OCTs, and, voilà!
>>>>>Labor peace. Did you really need to ask?
>>>
>>>"zztop8970" >:
>>>
>>>>That's not an answer to the question he asked, but to a different
>>>>question - "what are the benefits of paying the union, once workers have
>>>>unionized".
>>>>But, thnaks for conceding that a union is nothing more than a
>> "protection"
>>>>scam.
>>>
>>>I simply answered wrjames's question directly.
>>
>> No , you didn't. The question was why wold a company want thier employees to
>> unionize. Your answer is not a response to that question. Your reading
>> skills leave much to be desired.
>
>No, the question was "Why would any company want their
>employees following organized crime thugs?"
>
>On its face, this has nothing at all to do with unionizing.


Nonsense. It's precisely about unionizing.

William R. James